Framing theory holds that media coverage shapes public understanding not chiefly by telling audiences what to think about, but by how a story is presented: which aspects of an issue are made salient, which are left out, and what interpretation, causal story or moral judgment the presentation invites. Sociologist Erving Goffman introduced frame analysis in his 1974 book Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience, building on Gregory Bateson's earlier use of the term frame in the 1950s. Communication scholar Robert Entman gave the concept its most cited working definition in a 1993 journal article, writing that to frame is to select some aspects of a perceived reality and make them more salient in a communicating text, in such a way as to promote a particular problem definition, causal interpretation, moral evaluation and/or treatment recommendation. Framing is distinguished from agenda-setting theory, which concerns what issues get attention at all, whereas framing concerns how an issue that has already gained attention gets presented.
Facts
Concept Domain Formulated Year1974 is Goffman's own Frame Analysis; Entman's widely cited working definition for media studies specifically followed in 1993. Domain
Domain (category) Connections
Associated With
The two theories are taught as a contrasting pair: agenda-setting concerns what gets attention, framing concerns how it is presented.
Source Wikipedia
In Medium
Sources
1. Wikipedia
Wikimedia FoundationFraming (social sciences), Lead and History
frames select some aspects of a perceived reality and make them more salient in a communicating text
- Framing (social sciences), History
- Associated With: Agenda-Setting Theory, Framing (social sciences), Distinction from agenda-setting
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.